The Yellow vMeme = The Spiral Leader


It can become extremely challenging when people holding differing belief systems, worldviews, and levels of complexity of thinking encounter each other in business. The main challenge being that people are often only able to understand thinking based on the world view of their own value and belief systems. This can make communication between a leader and her or his team difficult. Especially when dealing with non negotiables. Each Value System will look for a different mode of leadership.

Beige and Purple communities are close knit and fearful of others who are different. Leaders are nearly always part of a direct lineage of succession and are often the ‘elders’ of a group. Leadership is driven by appealing to tribal loyalities.

Red leadership is about the absolute ‘power’ and rule of the individual. Leading from the front the Red leader demands respect and always comes first, even if it’s at the expense of those being led. Leadership is dictatorial and ego-driven.

Blue leadership is driven to serve a higher authority and observe and obey absolute laws and rules. While offering a degree of order, authority, predictability and stability this form of leadership can sometime be inflexible and pedantic in todays shifting market place. Leadership is compliance driven.

Orange Leadership is entrepreneurial and innovative but can sometimes be Machiavellian. This energy is driven to succeed at all costs. Showing emotion is considered a waste of time and money. Similar to Red, this mode of leadership is primarily self-seeking. Leadership is achievement driven.

Green leadership seeks interpersonal relationships. Honesty, empathy, authenticity and trust is highly valued. However this mode of leadership on it’s own can lead to challenging levels of “political correctness”. Leadership is primarily people driven.

A leader energised by the Yellow value set is able to see the whole spiral of human differences within an organization from a values perspective, and knows how to communicate with people at their respective levels. Cultural barriers such as race, religion, gender, age and lifestyles that divide and create conflict are managed, transcended and included in a syngergistic approach that serves the whole system. A leader expressing Yellow asks who is best suited to do what and why? Leadership is flex and flow driven.

The British Psychological Society's blog features a post about some new research suggesting that "Employees who perceive their leaders as ethical put in more effort and are more prepared to speak up and report issues at work. Judgements of ethical leadership depend upon the level of cognitive moral development: not only in the leaders, but the employees as well.Their research recruited 28 executives and 129 of their direct reports, who all completed a standard test of moral development. The direct report also gave their opinion of the executive's ethical leadership. The data was then combined into all possible pairs, where each pair comprised an executive and one of their reports. How did those executives seen as ethical do on the moral reasoning test? They scored highly; specifically they scored higher than their direct reports. That is, when leaders thought with somewhat bigger moral horizons than their followers, they were seen as most ethical. Jordan's team had predicted just this, based on an observation from social learning theory that the best way to model behaviours to others is to stand out from the crowd: sophisticated, novel moral reasoning can grab attention in a way that dutiful consistency will not. How do the followers appreciate these perspectives if they don't make sense to them? Well, the leader has to find a way to make them sensible. Luckily, post-Kohlberg researchers agree that individuals at higher levels can choose to speak 'the same ethical language' as others when necessary, offering a bridge between the two ways of thinking."

This research seems to support our own thinking that anyone in a leadership position should aim to push their development towards activating Yellow and becoming a Spiral leader.

Spiral Dynamics and Creativity



Most people in business today understand that organisations must embrace change and creativity in order to stay competitive in this ever changing, global marketplace. The good news is every company that employs human beings has all the resources they need to help them innovate.

It's their people!

Creative thinking need not be confined to products and services alone, but rather, the organisation could adopt an integrated approach to innovation that encourages all their people to look at every aspect of their operation from profiling clients to looking at competitors and spotting potential, 'game changing' opportunities. For example:

Process innovation - implementing new or significantly improved production or delivery methods.

Business model innovation - changing the way business is done, for example - EasyJet, Dell computers and global outsourcing.

Organisational innovation - creating or changing business structures, practices and models.

Marketing innovation - developing alternative marketing techniques to deliver improvements in price, position, packaging, product design or promotion.

Supply chain innovation - improving the way that materials are sourced from suppliers or improving methods of product delivery to customers.

Financial innovation - bringing together basic financial concepts. This might
include credit, risk-sharing, ownership or liquidity to produce new financial
services, products or ways of managing business operations.

So why do many organisations fail to innovate?

A recent study by the 'Institute of Employment Studies' identified the following key findings:

• Unsupportive culture.

• Leaders and managers dismissing ideas too soon.

• Leaders in innovative organisations demonstrate that they are more interested in learning from failure than in punishing it.

• Leaders being too risk averse.

• Lack of concrete resources that signal that the organisation is not taking innovation seriously.

• Innovative thinking is stifled when leaders become prescriptive as to how it must be achieved.

• Lack of practical tools and processes for innovation and creative thinking to happen.

• Lack of a sense of common purpose to innovate.

For the purposes of this blog let's look at the last statement.

"Lack of a sense of common purpose to innovate."


Our experience has shown us that everyone has the ability to think creatively about common day-to-day challenges and a culture of creativity is about utilising diverse thinking styles and approaches to problem solving. It's also about allowing people, up and down the hierarchy, to suggest solutions and ideas for anything they see that could be useful for the business. And finally, it's about offering positive incentives and acknowledgment to people for sharing ideas.

However, knowing this is not enough. There also has to be an understanding of - What motivates Whom to be 'creative and innovative' and Why?

There is mounting evidence from creativity studies to suggest that the drive towards creativity is essentially intrinsic.

Harvard's creativity professor, Teresa Amabile posits that:

"People will be most creative when they feel motivated primarily by the interest, enjoyment, satisfaction, and challenge of the work itself, and not by external pressures or inducements."

Which means that each of us could be encouraged to be creative and share ideas if the personal, value systems that drive and motivate us are recognised and rewarded.

Spiralling towards innovation.

The theory of Spiral Dynamics Integral was developed by Dr Don Beck and utilises some ideas from the Integral philosopher Ken Wilber, included during their brief association. However the core of Dr Beck's theory was drawn from the research and work of Dr Clare W Graves. For around 10 years Don Beck worked very closely with Clare Graves exploring how an individual's value systems developed through life in a process of transcendence and inclusion.

This work eventually resulted in the 'bio psychosocial' theory of human emergence called Spiral Dynamics.


The central idea is that what we humans feel, think and believe evolves through time and is dictated by our neurophysiological development. Our environment and our intrapersonal and interpersonal experiences that become the basis of our changing values, which in turn become the drivers that shape our behaviour, shape this.

In other words, some, if not most of the people, places and things we valued as children cease to motivate us as adults.

The SDi model uses the metaphor of a spiral of energy spiralling upwards as it moves the individual towards satisfying various needs that result in physical, emotional and intellectual adaptions to given life conditions that trigger further stages of development.

The model is not a typology but a description of a flowing process of psychobiological energy that fuels human drives. The drives form nested systems and express the evolution of each individual's personality and the development of culture as a whole.

The evolution of our values begin with:

1st BEIGE - 'ME' orientated - Physical survival and biogenic needs that have to be met. Hunger, thirst, shelter and reproduction are the primary drives.

2nd PURPLE - 'WE' orientated - Safety and security in numbers. Tribal communities are formed with beliefs and rituals to explain and manage the life conditions of the world.

3rd RED - 'ME' orientated - Power Gods, ego and action. Leaving the safety of the tribe to assert the self.

4th BLUE - 'WE' orientated- Stability and order. Obedience to the rules of higher authority. Sacrifice self now to gain bigger and better rewards later.

5th ORANGE - 'ME' orientated- Opportunistic and success orientated. Competing to achieve results. Entrepreneurial, rational and independent. Sacrifice others for self gain.

6th GREEN - 'WE' orientated - Harmony, empathy and love. Joining together for mutual growth in a global family. Everyone is welcome and everyone's opinion is right.

These are considered to be the 1st tier values. After this a second tier emerges and the process of vMeme evolution starts again, only now with Yellow becoming the new beige.

7th Yellow - 'ME' orientated and Independent. Takes an objective perspective and is able to move up and down the first tier value stack, from Beige to Green. A person operating from the Yellow value system is interested in finding and creating a new way of being that acknowledges the interconnection between all life processes and systems. An understanding that all value systems represent a partial truth as they emerged in response to certain life conditions at certain times in the history of a person or culture. Yellow seeks to transcend but include previous values as it moves up the spiral.

Dr Beck went on to develop the theory even further by exploring how cultures that emerge in response to the challenges people face also move up and down the Spiral.

The values that create a cultural paradigm (rituals, symbols or practices) are transmitted from one person to another through writing, speech, gestures, or other contagious and imitable behaviours. The most contagious individuals expressing their ideas and behaviours will most likely dictate the prevailing culture.

Richard Dawkins coined the term Memes to describe how ideas are passed on from person to person creating structures of belief in the same way as genes create biological structures.

In Spiral Dynamics Integral these are referred to as value Memes or 'vMemes' for short.

Integral Idea Generating

We take an integral approach to creativity and Innovation that utilizes the diverse thinking styles, personality types and motivators of diverse groups of people. This is where Spiral Dynamics Integral becomes indispensible as a map for understanding an individual, a team and an organization in terms of the potential for creativity. The central idea to our approach is to acknowledge and utilise people's vMeme perspectives as a motivator for creative thinking.

Time and again research has suggested that 'creative' problem solving is best served when there is a diverse mix of perspectives around an issue. Therefore it is becoming increasingly apparent that there is a need to elicit creativity from each and every individual across all departments in an organization in order to maximize idea generation.

However, as people are more inclined to be creative if they are intrinsically motivated, an idea generating session may be less productive if there are individuals expressing conflicting vMemes because people will express vMemes that represent their adaption to a given situation.

For example some people will become more inclined to seek and impose order if the situation they are experiencing seems chaotic and out of control. Of course this will be a matter of degrees and personal preference. However, when bringing people together to share ideas it is important to both determine which value systems best represent the issue being discussed and which idea generating processes will appeal to the intrinsic drives of the individuals in the group.

The following descriptions outline the various value systems (signified as vMemes) that can provide creative energy from a Spiral Dynamics Integral perspective.

Red vMeme

Egocentric, contrarian. Asserting self for dominance, conquest and power. The expression of an unhealthy set of Red values doesn't easily fit into society. This vMeme is "pre-law and order". It cannot control itself sufficiently enough alone to follow rules. It is expressed in raw displays of power with minimal regard for "right" and "wrong". However, Red's bright ideas can be revealed in the need to grab the limelight and be different and unique. A person expressing a healthy Red may be able to identify the opposite of any category and turn everything on its head to destroy (or invigorate) evolution. The Red vMeme can be useful if there is a need to break out and transform a situation, idea or process that is stuck in sameness.

Blue vMeme

Blue's core needs are for rules, knowledge, and competence. People expressing energy generated by a Blue set of values can be 'Fact Finders' who want to understand and learn and/or develop rules and theories for everything. They value expertise, logic and consistency. Their bright ideas can be revealed in an ability to analyze a situation through research, analysis - searching for laws and patterns as well as identifying and defining the available data to uncover the rules.

Orange vMeme

This vMeme is strategic, enterprising, rational and organizing. Driven by multiplicity and pragmatism to achieve results and get ahead. The energy generated by the orange vMeme is rational but can reject blue's authoritarianism. They value the individual and as such will put "rights" over "responsibilities". Their bright ideas are revealed in the ability to re-organize what already exists in order to move forward and innovate. They like to bend the rules to get ahead, but not too far. A person operating from the orange vMeme will adapt, substitute, modify and re-combine to collate the existing elements to form a new whole.

Green vMeme

This vMeme is relativistic, communal, sharing, affiliate and consensual. 'Everyone' is right. Green's core drivers are energized by working with others towards some greater, collective good. People expressing Green will value unity and authenticity, preferring cooperative interactions with diverse groups of people and helping individuals realize their potential in harmony with each other. No one is better than anyone else - just different. They build bridges between people through empathy and acceptance. The questions they ask are: How does it make you feel? What does it mean for you?

Yellow vMeme

Systemic, objective, improvisational, integrative, existential, flexible and questioning. The focus of people expressing the yellow vMeme is on flexibility, spontaneity and adaption. They like to find connections between conflicting views and value discovery and personal freedom without harm to others or excessive self-interest. They can stand outside a situation and quickly shift their subjective experience into an objective perspective. They see, hear and feel the big picture and their bright ideas are revealed in an ability to integrate disparate elements, blending and creating hybrids at the intersection of two or more positions. Everyone's ideas are considered partially valid and can be integrated in some way. They understand the value of all previous vMemes and seek a process of transcend and include when working creatively.


The drive to innovate exists within every single person in the world. Innovation is an indispensible capability for survival and is the process of an energetic and intelligent life force that is present and active within us all.

It's called 'Evolution'.

The sciences of the mind, body and the environment, both earthly and cosmological, are revealing that all living systems are either evolving themselves, or are part of a larger evolving system and evolution is another word for innovation.

Innovation is the result of an organisms creative adaptions to a given need.

Therefore 'WE' the people are innately creative, all of us, and all that needs to happen in order to encourage us to express our creativity, regardless of which vMemes are energising our behaviour, is to find the code that motivates each of us to innovate.

Spiral Dynamics Integral



We've just returned from spending a few days in Santa Barbara engaging in some continuing, personal and professional development looking at the most recent applications of Spiral Dynamics with Dr Don Beck.



It was great to hear, see and feel how different people are applying a 'biopsychosocial' model to their work during this seminar on the advanced applications of Spiral Dynamics Integral.

Dr Don led the programme, helping us to delve deeper into the theory and practice of this exciting, leading edge, yet surprisingly often, misunderstood technology for personal, professional, cultural and societal evolution.

Darrell Gooden shared some experiences of how he has been working with SD within the US Navy. Elza Maalouf outlined a case study from the work she is doing in Kuwait with the management structure of a well known restaurant and finally, a very interesting and inspiring analysis of the current financial situation from an SD perspective by Said E. Dawlabani.

We've been applying Spiral Dynamics Integral thinking for some time now as it fits perfectly with our four dimensional approach to energising the evolution of creativity, innovation and communication in organisations. Over the few days we spent together, the team of delegates worked on case studies, discussed our own projects and presented our experiences through the lenses of spiralling vMemes. It was great to share our thoughts and experiences with fellow SDi practitioners and refresh our understanding by talking things through. It was also fantastic to get up close and personal with Dr Don to explore how we will all be moving Spiral Dynamics Integral forward into the future.

Our Mojos have well and truly been re-energised by a combination of the seminar and the Californian sunshine, so we're looking forward to spiralling back to work this week.

Generation WE : The Movement Begins...

Hopefully...?


The Future Risk and Our Work

Looking through the World Economic Forum’s 2011 report on global risks has helped us focus on the future of the work we do from an engagement and innovation perspective.

We have been thinking for sometime about why we do what we do and what it means to us and those we work with. Since looking through a number of reports on megatrends, sustainability and the future of the global economy we are becoming very clear about which type organisations we want to work with and why, going forward into 2012 and beyond.

What seems clear about the current, global situation is that the Western world is not in a position to handle many more new shocks. The current financial crisis has taken it's toll as many people are pushing towards the edge of personal, economic disaster and some have already gone over the top. From a national and global perspective the disparity between rich and poor and potential social unrest seriously threaten our future wellbeing.

Recent research suggests this is due to four interconnected categories of risk.

Energy, food and water shortages and climate change.

Disease pandemics and geopolitical unrest.

Currency instability, fiscal crises and asset price collapse.

Growing criminality, corruption, terrorism and illegal trade.

Due to the interdependent, economic relationships between nations around the world we will need solid global governance and collaboration between businesses in the private and public sectors in all nations to tackle these issues.

Experts suggest that the key to facing the up and coming challenges in the four areas is in identifying risks quickly and implementing effective interventions as soon as possible.

The World Food Programme, The Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the Risk Response Network are examples of organisations at the leading edge of helping to tackle the issue of risk assessment and intervention.

Global socio-economic reports suggest we need to strengthen global coordination in order to create stronger financial systems of control, and develop (and put in place) innovative fiscal models that tackle long term, and under or unfunded issues like pensions and health care for our aging populations.

Also a coordinated move is required globally to increase communication and transparency to prevent flows of illegal capital from fragile nations trading in arms, drugs, prostitution and corrupt business practices. Haromising global laws and increasing information exchange through businesses and social networks would help to identify the emerging hot spots.

Continued awareness raising around the human impact of illegal capital is also vital to try and discourage people from buying goods that may have an illicit trail.

Successful businesses rely on the wellbeing of the ordinary working people and nations they trade with for their own stability so it is becoming increasingly vital for companies to take some responsibility for economic disparity they may be helping to create within the societies they operate in.

In the next decade the global population is predicted to grow to 7.7 billion people all looking to live a meaningful and healthy life. Cooperation and investment between nations and businesses around the impact of their policies on populations, environments and creation, use and distribution of resource like food, water and energy is another vital step that needs to be taken. This could include market led pricing to reflect the value, fragility and scarcity of resources used.

Finally, and probably most importantly, investment in encouraging creativity and new ideas. Developing technological innovations and finding breakthrough, socio-economic solutions to enhance and protect the health of people and environments and prolong the availability and supply of key resources is absolutely necessary for human wellbeing.

We've been thinking long and hard about this state of affairs and asking ourselves what we can do.

How are we uniquely placed to help in some way?

Our work is about increasing organisational engagement through helping people understand their unique value stacks, from a Spiral Dynamics Integral perspective, as a resource for energy and motivation. We also help people to develop their communication skills, expand their capacity for creativity and thereby encourage and increase networks of communication and innovation in companies through idea sharing.

As we understand it, a considerable part of the solution lays in increasing an individual's, a team's and an organisation's capacity for effective communication, collaboration and creativity.

With this in mind, we at 4DHuman being have made a pledge to try and only work with organisations that we feel understand the global issues outlined above and are willing to develop (or are currently developing) a policy and corporate strategy that includes addressing these global challenges in some way. However large or small the contribution.

Tom and Philippa

The A-maze-ing Brain



We were talking this morning about the human brain and more specifically the folds in the human brain.

These large grooves are called fissures - the smaller ones being called sulci, and the bigger outward folds being called gyri. This brain shape phenomena developed as the size and complexity of the human brain grew and evolved but the size of the human skull remained relatively unchanged.


The brain matter ‘sausaged’ itself into folds so that more of it could fit in the skull so we could have more and more complex thoughts without heads so large and heavy that our necks would break and human evolution cease altogether.

Much of our brain activity takes place on the outer layer of cells on the brain’s surface- so it makes sense to pack the brain into the skull in a way that allows for greater overall surface volume. On top of this our brains generate a vast amount of heat that a greater surface area allows us to release more efficiently - the science behind the winter wisdom of the bobble hat and the Victorian night cap.

So these are the benefits. Lots of short wave brain connections in the outer layers of brain cells and more efficient heat emissions. But there’s a way in which the very brilliance of the human brain’s design may indeed be limiting our own human brilliance.

The thing is – connections can’t jump across folds. So for all the connections we can and do make on a daily basis – there are some that remain separated, perhaps forever.

Think about the brain like Hampton Court maze. You go into the maze and try to find your way around it. You get lost down one of the many neural hedgeways when suddenly you bump into someone. You ask them if they know the way out but they don’t have anything to offer other than to join hands and continue a trial and error approach. That was the sum of possible connection in this branch of the brain maze. You have no idea who else is in the maze, if indeed anyone is. And if there is someone over the other side of the maze with additional information that might help you solve your dilemma, you’ll probably never find them.

Now imagine those folds and folds of hedge suddenly open up into a huge open perimeter and you can see everyone who was in the maze. Suddenly an open, loud, dialogue can take place between all of you on how to find the exit in the hedge in the best possible way. Or one of them might have a better idea like cracking open their champagne hamper and not bothering with an exit at all. Suddenly a whole range of possibilities open up in this smooth, open maze.


This condition of a fold-less brain in humans is known as Lessencephaly (or ‘Smooth Brain’) syndrome and often results in the sufferer developing an unusually small head. The gene-linked condition can lead to various physical and psycho-motor retardations. But even if the brain could somehow be stretched out in this way but retain its full volume and capacity, the size of such a fold-less, smooth brain on top of our current skeletal frame would kill us.

But what if we were even able to open up a small section of the maze. If just a bit of our brain didn’t have the standard fissures and barrier to brand new connections?
Could this small gift of cerebral open innovation turn us into some kind of Einstein?
Well, yes, that’s exactly what it could do. And indeed, what it did, for none other than Einstein himself.

Research published in the Canadian Lancet of Einstein’s preserved brain suggest that his intelligence may actually have been related in part to the absence of a fissure in a brain area involved in mathematical thinking, the inferior parietal lobe. So the connections he was able to make in order to come up with the theory of relativity, understand light and conceive of the idea that led to the creation of the atomic bomb – were due in part to the fact that no gyri or sulci brain fold barriers stood in the way of him making those connections in that part of his brain.

For now, however, our maze brains are the best evolution has to offer the human race.

But what if we applied our new Maze-Brain theory to organisations? What if all those folds and barriers broke down and suddenly every possible connection between every person, system and process in the organisation could be made? Look what Einstein came up with by the reduction of only one barrier. Imagine what ideas and innovations could arise with total open maze thinking within an organisation.

It could be…a-maze-ing.

Philippa

Your Brand

"It's difficult to believe in yourself because the idea of self is an artificial construction. You are, in fact, part of the glorious oneness of the universe. Everything beautiful in the world is within you. No-one really feels self-confident deep down because it's an artificial idea. Really, people aren't that worried about what you're doing or what you're saying, so you can drift around the world relatively anonymously: you must not feel persecuted and examined. Liberate yourself from that idea that people are watching you" - Russell Brand


I stumbled across this quote from Russell Brand this morning and thought it worthy of a blogette. Love him or hate him Russell Brand is walking the talk of self creation. So can we and should we look at this eccentric celeb for inspiration?

Well, from the quantum foam, to the big and continuing bang up through the evolution of the quark to the atom to the molecule to the cell to the human and – well to YOU – it’s all been and continues to be one big act of creation. So if underneath all the constructs of creation you are in fact quantum foam, the ground of being, or whatever you prefer to call it – that means you continue to create. To create yourself. So if as Russell says self confidence is merely an artificial idea, then so is lack of self confidence. If they're both artificial it makes no difference which one you choose. Other than - which one feels better?

Yes, we have our inherited biology, shared culture and environment to contend with. But can a committed shift in an individual’s subjective experience impact those other aspects? In Integral speak – can a big enough change in the upper left quadrant of subjective experience (the mind) impact the other three quadrants (objective self, shared culture and environment) enough to create permanent change? Could someone, for example imagine a life of fame and fortune and create that reality in their mind strongly enough to actually change their external and shared reality into the life of a courted celebrity. Er Russell…?

Philippa